Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Tipo de estudo
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infectio ; 25(4): 270-275, oct.-dic. 2021. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1286721

RESUMO

Resumen Objetivo: Comparar la expresión de mRNA y proteínas de SFRP1, PTPRN, CDO1, EDNRB, CDX2, EPB41L3 y HAND1 en pacientes con lesión intra-epitelial cervical de bajo y alto grado, con posterior progresión o regresión. Material y Método: Se realizó análisis de expresión de genes mediante RT-PCR y análisis de expresión de proteínas por inmunohistoquímica. El análisis estadís tico fue realizado con las pruebas: Wilcoxon, coeficiente de correlación de Spearman e índice de concordancia. Las muestras fueron pareadas en momento 1 y momento 2. Resultados: SFRP1 mostró tendencia de mayor expresión de mRNA en lesión intra-epitelial de bajo grado (momento 2) Vs. alto grado (momento 1). La expresión de proteínas por inmunohistoquímica de SFRP1 en casos de progresión (83,3 %) mostró disminución en su graduación (p = 0,0313*); los demás genes en estudio no tuvieron cambios estadísticamente significativos. Discusión: SFRP1 mostró comportamiento ajustado a resultados de estudios previos donde se encontró hipermetilado en lesiones intra-epiteliales de alto grado; su subexpresión por hipermetilación se reportó en otros canceres, proceso que colabora con su silenciamiento y transición epitelial-mesenquimatosa del cáncer de cuello uterino. Conclusiones. SFRP1 es potencial biomarcador en lesiones preneoplásicas del cuello uterino asociadas al virus de papiloma humano.


Abstract Objective. The aim of this work was to compare the expression of mRNA and proteins of SFRP1, PTPRN, CDO1, EDNRB, CDX2, EPB41L3 and HAND1 in patients with low and high grade cervical intraepithelial lesion, with subsequent progression or regression. Material and Methods: Gene expression analysis was conducted through RT-PCR and protein expression analysis was performed by immunohistochemistry. The statistics analysis were Wilcoxon test, Spearman's correlation coefficient and concordance index. The samples were paired during moment 1 (initial patient diag nosis) and moment 2 (follow-up histological diagnosis). Results: SFRP1 showed a trend of higher mRNA expression in low-grade intra-epithelial lesions (moment 2) Vs. high-grade (moment 1). The expression of proteins by immunohistochemistry of SFRP1 in progression cases (83.3%) showed a decrease in its graduation (p = 0.0313*); the other genes under study had no statistically significant. Discussion: SFRP1 showed a biological behavior adjusted to the results of previous studies where hypermethylation was found in high-grade intra-epithelial lesions; its subexpression by hypermethylation has been reported in other cancers, a process that collaborates with its silencing and epithelial-mesenchymal tran sition of cervical. Conclusions. SFRP1 is a potential biomarker in preneoplastic lesions of the cervix associated with human papillomavirus.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Papiloma , Sondas de DNA de HPV , Vírus , Proteínas , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Progressão da Doença , Alphapapillomavirus
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18299236

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cytomorphometric differences of multinucleated giant cells (MGCs) and CD68 reactivity of both MGCs and infiltrating macrophages may be associated with the clinical behavior of central and peripheral giant cell lesions of the jaws. STUDY DESIGN: Paraffin-embedded samples of central giant cell lesions (CGCLs; n = 20) and peripheral giant cell lesions (PGCLs; n = 20) were prepared for cytomorphometric analysis and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The nuclei in CGCLs were more numerous, larger, and more irregular than those in PGCLs. Furthermore, CD68 expression and the ratio of CD68(+) macrophage to MGCs were significantly greater in CGCLs than in PGCLs. Statistical correlations between CD68 expression and the staining-intensity distribution score within the diagnostic groups were significant in CGCLs and not significant in PGCLs. CONCLUSION: Although the CGCLs share some histopathologic similarities with PGCLs, differences in both nuclear morphometric parameters of MGC and CD68 immunoreactivity may underlie the distinct clinical behavior.


Assuntos
Doenças da Gengiva/patologia , Granuloma de Células Gigantes/patologia , Doenças Maxilomandibulares/patologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos CD/biossíntese , Antígenos de Diferenciação Mielomonocítica/biossíntese , Núcleo Celular/patologia , Forma Celular , Tamanho Celular , Criança , Feminino , Doenças da Gengiva/metabolismo , Granuloma de Células Gigantes/metabolismo , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Doenças Maxilomandibulares/metabolismo , Macrófagos/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...